This new survey consisted of step three parts. Area We incorporated concerns away from socio-market analysis (decades, amount of degree, parity, familial income, community, current marital position, sexual activity, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you may history of irregular cervical disease testing).
Region II composed of six questions about the mark ladies who are screened, age to start, volume, age or conditions to prevent regarding evaluation, and methods regarding screening. Just the participants who’d heard out-of HPV manage go ahead so you can Part III and this analyzed understanding of HPV from the type of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), mode out-of alert and you may protection.
Before the analysis, the brand new questionnaire out-of part II and you will region III into the Thai variation was contemplated, discussed, and you may modified up until consensus certainly 20 experts who have been all gynecologic oncologists (particular have been writers various other synchronous degree). The professionals rated each of 19 issues given that often ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The item-peak Blogs Validity List (I-CVI) are calculated for every single goods, and also the Posts Legitimacy List (CVI) try calculated by firmly taking the average proportion out-of 14 questions relating to knowledge about cervical cancer tests and you will 5 questions relating to HPV. The brand new CVI was indeed 1 for both elements of the fresh new survey (S1 Table). The brand new reliability are checked out into the 31 feminine with similar characteristic once the participants. The fresh Cronbach’ alpha coefficients into reliability had been 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical cancer tumors evaluating and you may 0.907 to possess understanding of HPV.
Research collection
Towards the go out from arranged colposcopy, the research assistant offered suggestions of one’s study with the female exactly who came across inclusion standards. The women who offered to take part provided created informed agree and responded the fresh survey independently on their own in advance of proceeding to help you colposcopy.
Analysis amassed for it investigation was basically socio-market study (Region We of your questionnaire), experience with cervical cancer tumors assessment (Part II), and experience in HPV (Region III).
Statistical investigation
The newest responses of real information on the cervical cancer evaluation and HPV were analyzed because of the per goods prior to rating categorization. Correct address was scored as step one while ‘completely wrong and you can being unsure of answer’ is obtained 0.
Out of fourteen inquiries regarding cervical cancer tests, feminine whose score had been ? ten were randomly categorized due to the fact that have ‘a beneficial knowledge’ usually was thought to be which have “not good training”. Having knowledge of HPV, feminine whose address try ‘never heard about HPV’ were omitted regarding data out of HPV https://getbride.org/da/varme-tjekkiske-kvinder/ knowledge.
From 5 concerns, female whoever get have been ? step 3 was basically regarded as which have ‘a beneficial knowledge of HPV’ normally just like the ‘bad knowledge’. Out-of 19 concerns, feminine whoever rating had been ? thirteen was classified given that with ‘an effective full knowledge’ otherwise because ‘negative complete knowledge’.
All studies was in fact gathered inside an electronic digital database and you may analyzed playing with SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to research demographic investigation and you will were described due to the fact quantity which have payment, indicate that have fundamental deviation or average that have assortment. The new organization ranging from for each variable and you may knowledge score was examined playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was developed from inside the multivariable data in addition to all details probably regarding the information and knowledge get. The fresh sensed level of mathematical benefits is a beneficial p-property value 0.05 otherwise shorter.
Overall performance
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>